Retirement Social Security

Is Dave Ramsey Right About Claiming Social Security at 62? The Math, Tested

Claiming early can grow investments, but there's a catch.

cellphone with webpage of ramsey solutions
Updated Oct. 7, 2026
Fact check checkmark icon Fact checked
Google Logo Add Us On Google info

Maybe you've heard what money mentor Dave Ramsey has to say about when to claim Social Security. He's said it usually makes sense to claim at 62, as long as you invest every bit of it, because you could end up with more money than if you wait.

His premise, based on historic stock market returns, is just one approach to your retirement plan. We'll run the numbers to show you if early benefits provide higher returns and the hidden catches to know about.

Now Available: The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income

Many successful investors eventually reach the same moment. The saving is done, the portfolio is built, and the question quietly changes from how much can I grow this to how much can I take out? Get that second question wrong and decades of good investing can come apart in a handful of years.

That is exactly what The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income helps answer.1 It covers what your retirement could actually cost, which income sources are worth using, and the withdrawal math that decides whether the money lasts. It is free today from Fisher Investments. Read More Here ›

What Ramsey is really suggesting

Ramsey's retirement rule works like this. A retiree takes Social Security as soon as eligible (at age 62), even if they don't need the money. They invest the checks instead of spending them.

Those extra years of Social Security benefit payments can potentially compound in the market, depending on investment returns. Ramsey himself often cites a 12% average return from good growth stock mutual funds, a figure many financial planners consider too optimistic.

For someone who doesn't need the benefit payments, this gives you additional years to supercharge your nest egg. It assumes you would get more earnings power from the smaller Social Security checks by getting them on the front end, as well as their healthy compounding returns.

How Social Security rewards waiting

But Social Security's mechanism pays more for patience. Taking benefits at 62 (the earliest eligibility age) gets you the smallest check and cuts your benefit by around 25-30% vs. waiting until full retirement age (FRA).

That same $1,400 check you get starting at age 62 would have been around $2,000 if you waited until FRA.

If you wait beyond FRA, delayed retirement credits increase your benefit by 8% per year, up to age 70. For someone with an FRA of 67, a $2,000 FRA benefit would rise to about $2,480 at age 70.

This higher benefit is not tied to stock market performance, and Social Security benefits may receive annual cost-of-living adjustments.

The break-even age to consider

Whatever returns Ramsey says the market can offer, there's a mathematical formula to consider. The break-even age is the age at which total lifetime benefits from waiting surpass total benefits from claiming early.

While this is somewhat of a calculated guess, AARP data suggests the break-even age for someone who claims benefits at 62 versus claiming at 70 is around 80-82. So, if you don't live to that break-even age, claiming earlier would generally provide more in total lifetime benefits.

If you live past break-even age, the delayed-but-larger benefits increase your guaranteed income. But you can't get payments after you die, so a shorter lifespan cancels out those larger payments. Cumulative lifetime dollars matter more than the monthly check amount.

Released: The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income (Sponsor)

Most people spend their entire working lives focusing on one thing: growing a pile of money. Then they retire and discover the skill they actually need is close to the opposite. Turning that pile into steady income, year after year, through good markets and bad, without ever running out. It may be the least discussed and most consequential transition in personal finance, and plenty of otherwise careful investors walk into it with no real plan.

That is exactly what The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income helps answer.1 It is a free guide from Fisher Investments covering what your retirement will really cost, where the cash flow should come from, and how much you can safely withdraw each year. Learn More Here ›

Investing checks isn't always a free win

Experts challenging Ramsey's plan have their reasons, including how delayed retirement credits compare to stock market investing. Each year you wait raises your monthly benefit by roughly 7% to 8%, and by exactly 8% a year from FRA to age 70 through delayed retirement credits. That increase is guaranteed for life and comes with annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs).

Stock market returns have historically averaged around 10% a year over long periods, but they fluctuate. Some years show much lower returns, which can harm a senior's portfolio at a time when they depend on it most.

Survivor benefits matter, too

Another consideration is how not waiting affects your spouse. If you're the higher earner, delaying benefits boosts the survivor benefit your spouse gets if you die first. The larger amount may be what's needed for the widow or widower to stay financially comfortable into old age, when costs for healthcare or long-term care increase substantially.

Using Ramsey's approach, the monthly benefits for the lower-earning, surviving spouse would be significantly diminished.

When claiming early still makes sense

One of the reasons some experts dispute Ramsey's claim is that it doesn't work for everyone. But this also means it can work for some people. Early claiming may be appropriate for those who need urgent income and can't bridge the gap in other ways. Those with a shorter life expectancy because of poor health or family history may consider it.

It may also work if you don't have a spouse or dependents to leave behind after you pass. In all of these situations, personal context determines the play. Your experience matters more than any single expert's rule.

Don't forget the earnings test

Finally, there's one hidden gotcha that can derail all of these plans if you're not careful. It's the Social Security earnings test, and it applies to those under FRA.

Social Security can withhold benefits if you claim before the FRA and continue to work. The thresholds are as follows:

  • Those under the FRA all year can earn $24,480. Social Security withholds $1 for every $2 you earn above that amount.
  • In the year you reach FRA, the limit jumps to $65,160. Social Security withholds $1 for every $3 you earn above that amount (until the month you hit FRA).

These withheld benefits are not permanently lost: at FRA, Social Security recalculates your monthly benefit to account for the months benefits were withheld. They are not repaid as a lump sum. But if you planned to invest the full benefit amount as part of Ramsey's advice, this can disrupt that plan.

Bottom line

Ramsey's "claim at 62 and invest" strategy assumes market returns can reliably beat the guaranteed increase of roughly 7% to 8% a year you'd get by waiting, and that you won't need the income in the meantime.

The best way to know if Ramsey's advice fits your retirement goals is to plug your own numbers into the Social Security website for more accurate estimates. Claiming early can still be reasonable for those in poor health or with urgent cash needs, but it's not a one‑size‑fits‑all rule.

AARP Benefits
  • Huge discounts on travel, groceries, prescriptions and more
  • Access to financial planning resources and health tools
  • Join AARP and get 25% off with automatic renewal


Financebuzz logo

Thanks for subscribing!

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.