Retirement Social Security

Raising the Social Security Tax Cap Could Fix the Program - But It Could Cost 900,000 Jobs

New information suggests changing the payroll tax cap could have consequences.

By Paige Cerulli , Edited by Laura Hohenstein

Updated Sept. 30, 2026

Add Us On Google

In an effort to preserve Social Security senior benefits in light of the program's approaching trust fund insolvency, some legislators have turned their attention to the Social Security payroll tax cap. Calls to raise or eliminate the payroll tax cap suggest that doing so might increase the program's revenue and help keep it financially stable.

But others are warning that removing or raising the cap could also have serious consequences, and it isn't necessarily the simple solution to preserving the program that it seems to be. Here's what you should know about this issue.

Now Available: The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income

Many successful investors eventually reach the same moment. The saving is done, the portfolio is built, and the question quietly changes from how much can I grow this to how much can I take out? Get that second question wrong and decades of good investing can come apart in a handful of years.

That is exactly what The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income helps answer.¹ <p class="">Investing in securities involves a risk of loss. Past performance is never a guarantee of future returns. Investing in foreign stock markets involves additional risks, such as the risk of currency fluctuations. Guides are provided by Fisher Investments. The publisher may be compensated when readers request a guide.</p> It covers what your retirement could actually cost, which income sources are worth using, and the withdrawal math that decides whether the money lasts. It is free today from Fisher Investments. Read More Here ›

Potential consequences of raising or eliminating the payroll tax cap

Opponents of raising or eliminating the tax cap are sounding the alarm about its potential consequences. The Tax Foundation, an independent tax policy nonprofit, argues that subjecting more earnings to Social Security taxes could significantly increase the tax burden on higher earners and employers.

According to the Tax Foundation, major changes to the payroll tax cap could also have consequences for employment. Its modeling found that if the cap were raised to $346,000 in 2027 and indexed to wage growth, bringing roughly 90% of wages under the Social Security payroll tax, the change could result in nearly 900,000 fewer jobs over the long run.

Employers pay 6.2% in Social Security taxes on covered wages, while employees pay another 6.2%. Raising or eliminating the cap would therefore increase the amount of earnings subject to those taxes. The Tax Foundation argues that the added cost could affect employers' hiring decisions while also giving some high earners an incentive to work less or report less taxable income.

Shopping for cheaper auto insurance? Enter your zip code here to get started.

What the Social Security payroll tax cap is

Workers pay taxes into the Social Security program each year, but the amount of income subject to the tax is capped. In 2026, the payroll tax cap is $184,500, meaning workers only pay taxes on the first $184,500 they earn during the year. High earners with incomes above that figure only pay taxes on a portion of their income, but lower earners pay taxes on their entire income.

Why raising the tax cap appeals to lawmakers

Lawmakers are under pressure to identify solutions to keep the Social Security trust fund solvent and avoid benefits cuts. According to the 2026 Social Security Trustees report, the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund may become depleted by the fourth quarter of 2032. That's one quarter earlier than the 2025 report projected.

The report projects that if the fund becomes depleted, the Social Security program's income may only be sufficient to pay 78% of total scheduled benefits. The scenario might result in an automatic benefits reduction.

The tax cap is one option that's gained bipartisan support. Republican Senator Bernie Moreno joined Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren in June to write a New York Times op-ed calling for lifting the payroll tax cap, noting it as "a common-sense solution."

Released: The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income (Sponsor)

Most people spend their entire working lives focusing on one thing: growing a pile of money. Then they retire and discover the skill they actually need is close to the opposite. Turning that pile into steady income, year after year, through good markets and bad, without ever running out. It may be the least discussed and most consequential transition in personal finance, and plenty of otherwise careful investors walk into it with no real plan.

That is exactly what The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income helps answer.¹ <p class="">Investing in securities involves a risk of loss. Past performance is never a guarantee of future returns. Investing in foreign stock markets involves additional risks, such as the risk of currency fluctuations. Guides are provided by Fisher Investments. The publisher may be compensated when readers request a guide.</p> It is a free guide from Fisher Investments covering what your retirement will really cost, where the cash flow should come from, and how much you can safely withdraw each year. Learn More Here ›

How changing the tax cap might boost Social Security revenue

Changing the tax cap is appealing to legislators because of the potential revenue it might generate for the program. According to the Roosevelt Institute, a liberal think tank, eliminating the payroll tax limit might cover about 67% of Social Security's 75-year solvency gap. Changing the cap so that workers pay taxes on a maximum of 90% of their earnings would help cover 28% of the solvency gap.

Tyler Bond, a senior fellow at the National Academy of Social Insurance, pointed out that changing the tax cap may impact a very small segment of the workforce. According to Bond, just 6% of workers earn above the tax cap each year, and 20% of workers will ever earn above the tax cap threshold at any point in their career.

The question of increasing benefits if the tax cap is changed

The issue is more complex than simply deciding to raise or eliminate the tax cap. Social Security is a social insurance program, and the taxes an individual pays are closely tied to the benefits they receive. Since higher earners pay more tax, they also receive higher benefits based on their earnings. Lower earners pay less tax but also receive lower benefit amounts based on their earnings.

If the government were to remove or eliminate the tax amount but didn't pay higher earners more in benefits, that social insurance program structure would be lost.

The revenue generation if benefits were increased

Increasing benefits could eat into the extra revenue generated, though. According to the Roosevelt Institute, if the cap were eliminated and benefits were increased, the revenue would cover just 48% of the solvency gap, not 67%. And if the taxable maximum was set at 90% of earnings but benefits were increased, the revenue would cover 22% of the solvency gap, not 28%.

Retirement News: Almost 80% of Americans fear a retirement age increase — here’s the real reason why

Bottom line

The proposal to change the tax cap is just one of several proposed ideas, and it's not enacted law. Congress has not yet identified a single or combination of solutions, and every fix, including this one, involves trade-offs. Be sure to watch how this important issue evolves, and monitor updates that might indicate how your own employer or industry might be affected by any changes.

At this time, potential Social Security benefits cuts are still on the table. It might also be a good idea to revisit your retirement plan to see if there's any wiggle room in your budget to cover the gap if your benefits were reduced.

More from FinanceBuzz: