Retirement Social Security

Mark Cuban Has a Blunt Message for Retirees Who Depend on Social Security

The billionaire warned a policy shift could quietly shrink benefits for seniors.

Mark Cuban
Updated Nov. 13, 2026
Fact check checkmark icon Fact checked
Google Logo Add Us On Google info

Mark Cuban isn't an expert on living on just Social Security, but when the billionaire entrepreneur speaks up about a policy change affecting seniors, people listen. In March 2025, Cuban used social media to warn that a shift in how the Social Security Administration (SSA) handles phone support and office access could hurt the very people the program is meant to protect.

His comments landed at a moment of real anxiety for retirees, many of whom lean on Social Security for most or all of their income. So when changes to customer service threaten to make benefits harder to access, even without touching the benefit formula itself, it's worth understanding exactly what Cuban said, what prompted it, and what actually happened next.

Now Available: The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income

Many successful investors eventually reach the same moment. The saving is done, the portfolio is built, and the question quietly changes from how much can I grow this to how much can I take out? Get that second question wrong and decades of good investing can come apart in a handful of years.

That is exactly what The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income helps answer.1 It covers what your retirement could actually cost, which income sources are worth using, and the withdrawal math that decides whether the money lasts. It is free today from Fisher Investments. Read More Here ›

What Cuban actually said

Cuban posted his criticism on social media on March 19, 2025, taking aim at federal cost-cutting efforts tied to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 

According to the financial news and information website Benzinga, Cuban said: "Got to give DOGE credit for being the first to cut entitlements. End telephone support for Social Security, cut dozens of SS offices, and make Grandma and Grandpa finally get online to confirm their payments. What an amazing back-door way to cut payments! Gonna be some upset seniors at town halls!"

When another social media user pushed back, suggesting Cuban should personally fund Social Security if he cared so much, Cuban clarified his stance on how the program works: "You do realize that Social Security is returning the money you pay out of your paycheck? And the administration said they would not reduce payments in any way."

He then zeroed in on his core argument, asking a pointed question: "We all are good with getting rid of corruption. What corruption does closing dozens of SS offices get rid of?" Cuban followed up by asking how seniors who rely exclusively on Social Security checks could be expected to afford internet access, or what people without internet or the ability to travel were supposed to do if they needed to reconfirm their bank account information.

Cuban's core argument: A "back-door" benefit cut

Cuban wasn't arguing that Congress or the SSA had formally reduced benefit amounts. His point was more nuanced and, in some ways, more unsettling for retirees: making it harder for seniors to reach a live person, fix an error, or confirm their identity could functionally reduce what people actually receive, even if the benefit formula never changes.

Think of it this way. If a retiree can't get through to an agent to correct a payment mistake, appeal a denial, or restart a paused benefit, the dollar amount on paper doesn't matter. The money doesn't show up. Cuban described this dynamic as a "back-door way to cut payments," arguing that service friction can act like a stealth benefit cut for people who aren't comfortable navigating online systems.

What prompted the controversy

Cuban's comments came amid a broader wave of SSA changes in early 2025, including office consolidations and new identity-verification requirements tied to federal efficiency initiatives. Reports at the time suggested the SSA planned to eliminate the ability to change direct deposit information over the phone, which raised fears that phone support was being eliminated altogether.

Released: The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income (Sponsor)

Most people spend their entire working lives focusing on one thing: growing a pile of money. Then they retire and discover the skill they actually need is close to the opposite. Turning that pile into steady income, year after year, through good markets and bad, without ever running out. It may be the least discussed and most consequential transition in personal finance, and plenty of otherwise careful investors walk into it with no real plan.

That is exactly what The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income helps answer.1 It is a free guide from Fisher Investments covering what your retirement will really cost, where the cash flow should come from, and how much you can safely withdraw each year. Learn More Here ›

What the SSA actually changed

Soon after the backlash, the SSA moved to clarify its policy rather than reverse course entirely. The agency confirmed that general telephone services were not going away. Callers could still speak with a representative about their benefits case, file claims, and get help over the phone.

What did change was narrower: direct deposit updates. The SSA said beneficiaries could no longer change their bank account information by phone alone. Instead, updates would require either two-factor authentication through a "my Social Security" online account or an in-person visit to a local office. The agency said this shift addressed fraud, noting that approximately 40% of Social Security direct deposit fraud had involved phone-based change requests.

The SSA continued refining its identity-verification approach throughout 2025. The SSA required appointment-based service at field offices nationwide starting January 6, 2025. By April 14, 2025, the agency announced that individuals unable to use their online "my Social Security" account could complete all benefit claims, including Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), Medicare, and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) applications, entirely by phone, supported by new anti-fraud tools. 

Retirement, survivor, and auxiliary benefit claims, however, no longer generally required in-person identity verification if someone couldn't use the online portal. Acting Commissioner Lee Dudek said at the time, "We have listened to our customers, Congress, advocates, and others, and we are updating our policy to provide better customer service to the country's most vulnerable populations."

The SSA has also pointed to improvements since then. According to the agency, average wait times for its appointment-based field office system dropped from about 29.6 minutes in October 2024 to about 22.0 minutes in September 2025, and the share of field office visits handled through appointments completed rose from about 9.6% to about 38.6% over the same period.

Why accessibility concerns still matter for retirees

Even with these clarifications, Cuban's broader warning points to a real vulnerability for older Americans. Social Security is a critical income source for seniors, and for some retirees it's nearly their entire income. For that group, even temporary friction, like a missed call, a backlog in verifying a bank account, or a long wait for an appointment, can create real financial strain.

Centralization of casework through newer national scheduling and workload-management systems has also shifted how seniors interact with the agency, moving away from the local-office relationships many retirees were used to. Critics have raised concerns about longer wait times and increased reliance on online tools that aren't equally accessible to every retiree. The SSA has pushed back on these concerns, pointing to its own service-time data as evidence that the transition has gone smoothly.

What retirees can do today

Retirees don't have to wait for policy debates to settle before taking a few protective steps. Setting up and regularly checking a "my Social Security" online account allows beneficiaries to monitor earnings history, confirm payment details, and catch errors early. Double-checking that your name, birth date, and work record match IRS records can help avoid processing delays down the road.

Keeping thorough records, including copies of applications, appeals, and account statements with dates of contact, can make a meaningful difference if a dispute arises. And if phone support is hard to reach, retirees have other options: online messaging through the SSA website, mail correspondence, or scheduling an in-person appointment at a local office.

For anyone navigating a denied claim or a paused benefit, an accredited representative or attorney familiar with SSA appeals can help clarify next steps. The SSA's national line remains reachable at 1-800-772-1213 for scheduling appointments or general questions.

Bottom line

Mark Cuban's comments weren't about changing how Social Security benefits are calculated. They were a warning that bureaucratic friction, lost phone access, closed offices, and confusing new verification rules can function like a quiet benefit cut for the seniors least equipped to navigate it. The SSA has since clarified and adjusted several of the specific policies that sparked the outcry, but the underlying tension Cuban raised, between modernization and accessibility, remains relevant for retirees today.

Staying proactive is the best defense. Creating a "my Social Security" account, keeping personal records current, and knowing multiple ways to reach the agency can help retirees protect their retirement income, save money in retirement, and avoid getting caught off guard by future changes, regardless of which administration is in office.

AARP Benefits
  • Huge discounts on travel, groceries, prescriptions and more
  • Access to financial planning resources and health tools
  • Join AARP and get 25% off with automatic renewal


Financebuzz logo

Thanks for subscribing!

Please check your email to confirm your subscription.