Retirement Retirement Planning

Two Trump 401(k) Proposals Could Change What's in Your Retirement Plan

Trump's 401(k) fight could reshape your retirement fund choices.

By Jordan Major , Edited by Laura Hohenstein

Updated Sept. 25, 2026

Add Us On Google

The investment choices inside your 401(k) could eventually look different as the Trump administration works on new rules governing how retirement plan managers select funds.

One proposal would push fiduciaries to focus more strictly on financial considerations when choosing investments, potentially making it harder for some environmental, social, and governance (ESG) funds to appear in a workplace retirement plan. At the same time, another Trump administration effort could open the door to more private-market and alternative investments.

Now Available: The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income

Many successful investors eventually reach the same moment. The saving is done, the portfolio is built, and the question quietly changes from how much can I grow this to how much can I take out? Get that second question wrong and decades of good investing can come apart in a handful of years.

That is exactly what The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income helps answer.¹ <p class="">Investing in securities involves a risk of loss. Past performance is never a guarantee of future returns. Investing in foreign stock markets involves additional risks, such as the risk of currency fluctuations. Guides are provided by Fisher Investments. The publisher may be compensated when readers request a guide.</p> It covers what your retirement could actually cost, which income sources are worth using, and the withdrawal math that decides whether the money lasts. It is free today from Fisher Investments. Read More Here ›

Trump wants 401(k) decisions focused on financial factors

The Labor Department has submitted a proposal that would change the rules governing how fiduciaries choose investments and exercise shareholder rights in workplace retirement plans.

According to the federal regulatory agenda, the goal is to ensure those decisions are based only on financial considerations tied to an investment's risk and expected return, rather than unrelated social objectives.

Under the current rule adopted in 2022, fiduciaries can consider the economic effects of climate change and other ESG factors when they believe those issues could affect an investment's risk or return. The forthcoming proposal could narrow the circumstances in which nonfinancial considerations play a role.

Even under the existing rules, however, plan managers cannot sacrifice returns or take on additional investment risk simply to pursue objectives unrelated to retirement benefits.

Shopping for cheaper auto insurance? Enter your zip code here to get started.

The full proposal has not been released yet

The new proposal is still under review by the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, which received it on June 30, 2026.

As a result, the public has not yet seen the full proposal or exactly how the Labor Department intends to apply the new standard.

Another Trump proposal could bring more investments into 401(k)s

While one proposal could tighten how funds are selected, the administration is also trying to broaden the types of investments that workplace retirement plans can offer.

Trump signed an executive order in August 2025 directing regulators to make it easier for defined-contribution plans to include funds with alternative assets. Those could include private equity and debt, real estate, commodities, infrastructure, certain actively managed digital-asset vehicles, and lifetime-income strategies.

The Labor Department followed in March 2026 with a proposed rule explaining how fiduciaries should evaluate those assets. It also included process-based safe harbors intended to reduce litigation risk when plan managers follow a prudent investment-selection process.

The department says more than 90 million Americans participate in employer-sponsored defined-contribution plans that could potentially be affected by the broader push.

Released: The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income (Sponsor)

Most people spend their entire working lives focusing on one thing: growing a pile of money. Then they retire and discover the skill they actually need is close to the opposite. Turning that pile into steady income, year after year, through good markets and bad, without ever running out. It may be the least discussed and most consequential transition in personal finance, and plenty of otherwise careful investors walk into it with no real plan.

That is exactly what The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income helps answer.¹ <p class="">Investing in securities involves a risk of loss. Past performance is never a guarantee of future returns. Investing in foreign stock markets involves additional risks, such as the risk of currency fluctuations. Guides are provided by Fisher Investments. The publisher may be compensated when readers request a guide.</p> It is a free guide from Fisher Investments covering what your retirement will really cost, where the cash flow should come from, and how much you can safely withdraw each year. Learn More Here ›

The two proposals could reshape 401(k) menus

Together, the proposals create an unusual balance. One is intended to make fiduciaries more comfortable considering a wider range of investments, while the other could tighten the standard used to decide whether those investments belong in a retirement plan.

The two goals do not necessarily conflict. A private-market investment, ESG fund, or other strategy could still be included if a fiduciary determines that it makes financial sense based on expected returns, risk, diversification, and costs.

The alternative-assets proposal also says the Labor Department does not want to declare one asset class inherently better or worse than another. The focus is instead on whether fiduciaries follow a prudent process when evaluating investments.

Employers could become more cautious about some funds

A stricter financial standard could make some employers more cautious about funds marketed heavily around environmental or social goals.

Because employers and plan committees carry significant fiduciary responsibilities, uncertainty around a new rule may influence which investments they are comfortable putting on a 401(k) menu.

What this could mean for your 401(k)

None of the proposals would automatically force your employer to remove an ESG fund or start offering private equity.

Employers and other fiduciaries would still decide which investments appear in their plans, but the regulatory changes could affect the range of options they are willing to consider. Some employers could eventually explore professionally managed investments with private-market exposure if the alternative-asset rules make them more comfortable doing so.

Any changes would likely vary by employer and plan provider. If your 401(k) lineup changes, any notice explaining whether a fund is being removed, replaced, or supplemented with new options will be worth reviewing carefully.

Retirement News: Almost 80% of Americans fear a retirement age increase — here’s the real reason why

Focus on the investments already in your plan

There is little reason to overhaul your retirement portfolio because of rules that have not been finalized. Savers may be better served by focusing on the factors they can already control, including fees, diversification, risk, historical performance, and whether their asset allocation matches their retirement timeline.

Those considerations matter whether a fund carries an ESG label, tracks a broad stock index, or eventually includes private assets.

More choice is not automatically better, either. Alternative investments may offer additional diversification, but private-market assets can also be less liquid, harder to value, and more complicated than traditional publicly traded investments.

Bottom line

The Trump administration is pursuing two changes that could pull 401(k) investment menus in different directions. One could broaden access to alternative assets, while the other would reinforce that fiduciaries should choose investments based on financial considerations.

Nothing has changed in your retirement plan yet, however. Watching your investment lineup and reviewing any future plan notices could help you avoid money mistakes if the new rules eventually affect where your retirement savings can be invested.

More from FinanceBuzz: