The Social Security Advice Upper-Middle-Class Retirees Regret Following

If you were a high-income earner during your career, you were likely told that Social Security wouldn't play a major role in your retirement. The common guidance was to treat it as a bonus rather than a foundation — something you could afford to delay while your investments did the heavy lifting. For many upper-middle-class retirees, that advice translated into waiting as long as possible to claim benefits in order to maximize their monthly check.

While this strategy often sounds sensible on paper, overlooking the real value of Social Security can quietly reshape your retirement plan in costly ways. Some retirees end up saving far more than necessary, taking on additional investment risk, or postponing retirement altogether to hit an arbitrary "number." In hindsight, many wish they had taken a more balanced approach.

Here's the Social Security advice that upper-middle-class retirees most often regret following.

Why higher earners often receive different guidance

As an upper-middle-class retiree, you were likely encouraged to treat Social Security as a secondary or even optional income source. Advisors often assumed your portfolio would carry the load while your delayed benefits continued to grow.

While this is sound advice for many retirees, it isn't the best option for everyone. On paper, these ideas make sense. In practice, retirement introduces variables that are difficult to model in advance.

Market returns are unpredictable. Your family's health care needs may change dramatically. Spending plans change considerably based on travel, home repairs, new vehicles, and gifts to your beneficiaries. All of these factors and more lead to uncertainty about how long your money truly needs to last.

The "always delay to 70" rule doesn't always work

One of the most common recommendations is to delay Social Security until age 70 to maximize your monthly benefit. It's true that benefits increase by about 8% per year after full retirement age, according to the Social Security Administration.

What often gets overlooked is how you fund those years of delay.

Many retirees who delay Social Security benefits for higher checks later in life often end up drawing heavily on investment accounts in their 60s to cover living expenses. While the average stock market performance over the last 30 years is 9%, actual returns vary widely each year. If markets perform poorly early in retirement, those withdrawals can permanently weaken your portfolio and wreak havoc on your retirement plan. This is known as sequence-of-returns risk.

Once they've retired, some seniors realize that claiming earlier could have reduced pressure on their investments and improved overall sustainability. While monthly benefits when claiming early are smaller, the peace of mind could be worth it if you have other sources of income.

Treating Social Security as irrelevant income

Another widely accepted idea is that Social Security barely matters if you have a solid nest egg. This mindset often leads retirees to underestimate the unique value of the benefit and its impact on their savings.

Social Security provides an inflation-adjusted income for life. That combination is nearly impossible to replicate with private investments unless you have a massive portfolio.

When retirees downplay this guaranteed income, they often make three costly mistakes: saving more than necessary, taking on excessive investment risk, or delaying retirement longer than they need to. While many workers struggle to save enough, higher earners who overlook Social Security may overshoot their savings goals, sacrificing disposable income during their working years.

Others take on additional risk in an effort to reach a specific retirement number, not realizing that Social Security can cover a meaningful portion of their long-term income needs. And some delay retirement out of fear their savings won't last, when earlier claiming could have provided a steady income and reduced pressure on their portfolio.

Prioritizing tax minimization over cash flow stability

Tax efficiency is especially attractive to higher earners, and many retirees focus heavily on keeping taxable income as low as possible. Strategies such as delaying Social Security to avoid income thresholds or aggressively managing required minimum distributions can look appealing.

The unintended consequence is that some retirees end up with unstable or overly complex income streams. Large withdrawals from tax-deferred accounts, irregular income timing, or reliance on market performance can create unnecessary stress. While the tax bill is lower, was it worth all of the effort?

For many retirees, a consistent and predictable cash flow often matters more than achieving the lowest possible tax rate in any single year.

Longevity and health care uncertainty change the math

Even well-prepared retirees tend to underestimate how long retirement may last. According to the Social Security Administration, the average 65-year-old man will live for 17 and a half more years, while a 75-year-old man will live for almost 11 more years. And a significant percentage of people who reach these ages will live into their 90s.

Health care and assisted living costs tend to rise as you get older, even when you have Medicare coverage. Social Security benefits help to cover these costs and supplement your other sources of income, like retirement savings, part-time work, pensions, and rental properties.

How the misunderstanding happens

While the advice to save like Social Security won't be there for you and to delay taking benefits to receive a bigger check isn't wrong, the problem is that retirees often apply it too rigidly.

Upper-middle-class retirees are more likely to receive guidance that assumes steady markets and predictable expenses. Yet, many expenses in retirement are unpredictable, and the markets rarely return average results.

Having the steady income from Social Security benefits makes it easier to cover unexpected expenses and relieves some of the pressure of taking money out of retirement accounts when the market is volatile.

Bottom line

Many upper-middle-class retirees find that it's worth revisiting conventional Social Security advice. Strategies that sound appropriate for higher earners may lead to unintended consequences when you leave your job and have to rely on your investments for retirement income.

Unlike other investments, Social Security benefits provide a guaranteed income with annual increases that counter the impact of inflation on your spending power. This steady stream of income helps you balance portfolio risk, taxes, and long-term flexibility in your retirement plan.

You May Also Like

Almost 80% of Americans Fear a Retirement Age Increase — Here’s the Real Reason Why

Read More

10 Smart Money Moves to Retire

Read More

The Easiest Way to Diversify Your Investment Portfolio With Fine Art

Read More

7 Brilliant Ways to Build Wealth After 40

Read More

5 Ways Seniors Are Throwing Away Money

Read More

Best High-Yield Savings Accounts of January 2026: Earn Up to 4.31% APY

Grow your savings faster with these high-yield savings accounts

Read More

Have $150K+ in Assets? See If You Can Retire Early

Zoe Financial Benefits

• Get matched with vetted and fiduciary-certified financial advisors
• Take the mystery out of retirement planning
• Their matching tool is free

Find an advisor

Paid Non-Client Promotion

FinanceBuzz doesn’t invest its money with this provider, but they are our referral partner. We get paid by them only if you click to them from our website and take a qualifying action (for example, opening an account.)

---

Subscribe Today

Unlock the Best Banking Deals and Bonuses

From high-yield savings accounts to cashback checking and sign-up bonuses, we bring you the best banking offers to grow your money smarter.

or

SEE TOP BANKING OFFERS →

By submitting this form you agree to receive emails from FinanceBuzz and to the privacy policy and terms